Skip to main content

The Troubled Craftsman: Literary Analysis

The following is a literary analysis of 'The Troubled Craftsman', the first chapter of The Craftsman.

‘The Troubled Craftsman’ discusses that true craftsmanship is doing quality work for the sake of doing it and not as a means to an end. All craftsmen have a skill which they have practiced thousands of hours when they reach a stage where they can feel fully and think deeply about their craft. The satisfaction of working is its own reward.

In the beginning, the author portrays three images of the craftsman. First is the traditional image of a carpenter, in a neat shop engaged in precision work. His profession is troubled by the automated furniture factory down the road. The proximity is ironical to the difference in their approach to work: quality over quantity. Second is the example of a lab technician, pondering over the procedure, weighing the procedure with her execution, trying to find the error in either. Third is the visiting conductor working obsessively with the string players. All of them are working not because they are supposed to, because of the satisfaction they derive from working on their craft. Hence, they are referred to as craftsmen.

Under ‘The Modern Hephaestus’, the author discusses a hymn to Hephaestus, the master God of craftsmen which praise him as a maker of civilization. In archaic times, craftsmanship was respected and brought together people to form a community in which skills were handed down from generation to generation. The craftsmen were mostly middle class wedged in between a few aristocrats and a mass of slaves, between great and negligible recognition. In this era, one’s birth marked one’s profession rather than innate skill. Their inherited skills determined their relation to society.

By classical times, in the writing of Aristophanes, the craftsman was thought to be ‘stupid’. In the writings of Aristotle, he praised professionals who formulated plans over those who executed them. Thought was praised over action. In the classical society, gender distinction was made between the skills a man or woman could use. The author marks that this gender discrimination is still present in our society as we relate domestic and industrial crafts with females and males respectively. Among the philosophers, Plato upheld the ideal of Hephaestus and wrote that all craftsmanship was quality driven work and the professional distinctions prevented people from realizing how much they shared.

In the next section, the author compares Linux programmers with the traditional idea of craftsmen. Linux is an open source software which means that anyone can access it which differs from the archaic society where only heirs could practice their skills. The community is focused on achieving quality, but it becomes difficult to hold the work to a standard of quality when it is an open community. The code is constantly evolving as there is an instant relation between problem solving and problem finding which can improve its quality. In the online community, there is no gender distinction. The worker is not important, only their work is subjected to discussion which gives the a freedom of expression.

In the ‘Weakened Motivation’ section, the author discusses the communist and capitalist society and how they have not been able to serve the craftsman’s aspiration for quality. The communist society seeks to motivate its workers by encouraging them to work for the community’s greater good. This led to a material indifference and lower productivity as is apparent from the dilapidated state of suburbs of Moscow. There was no accountability for one’s work, no opportunity for leadership as the decisions were made by state authorities. However, the moral imperative to do good for the community worked in Japan’s case where the work was subjected to a standard of quality and managers were involved in the execution. The subordinates had freedom of expressing their views to the leaders which encouraged them to work for the communal good.

The belief of the capitalist society, individual competition and personal gain can spur quality, is inspected through the example of the production of mobile phones. Motorola and Nokia got rid of professional distinctions between their employees which encouraged an exchange of ideas and knowledge between business units. This approach ultimately led to their success. By contrast, Ericsson rigidly organized employees into offices that competed with each other.  It led them to hoard information from others and retarded the company’s growth and ultimately Ericsson fell away.

The corporations that succeeded were those that were constantly involved in problem solving and finding which allowed them to evolve, instead of those that set clear standard of achievements and required closure. Companies lacking in collegiality, which lacks in a competitive workspace encouraged by capitalism, ultimately demotivate employees. They lack freedom of expression of ideas to their employers and ultimately disconnect themselves from their work. The rewarding aspect of capitalism is reserved only for those at the top of the hierarchy as is apparent from the statement, ‘in 2004 the CEO earned 350 to 400 times as much’ the median-level employees. Thus a capitalistic society has created a social divide by increasing the economic difference between employees of the same organization.

In such a situation, middle-level skilled workers don’t stay loyal to their companies as young workers or peers from India and China can work for lower pay and are ultimately preferred over them. Their experience loses ‘institutional value’.  As employees are treated as a means to an end, they too apply a similar approach to their work. In all this, the quality of work is compromised as it is ‘disassociate labor’.

‘Neither corporatism nor crude labels get at the institutional issue’ as ‘the craftsman’s ethos of doing good work for its own sake is unrewarded.’ Organizations, that have created a balance through employee’s freedom of expression, leader’s involvement in the process and having a vision for the communal good, sustain an environment in which a standard of quality can be subjected to the work.

In the ‘Fractured Skills’ section, the author explores how the divide between planning and execution can negatively impact the quality of the work. He is in favor of training and rejects the idea of raw talent responsible for success in a particular craft. He illustrates this through the example of Mozart and how he had to undergo years of practice to ‘train his great innate musical memory’ before he could ‘produce music spontaneously.’

The author favors repetition organized according to the individual’s attention span as a method to gain and build skills. Training that involves a circular rhythm of problem solving and finding allows for a skill to be nurtured. Novices in a field are deprived of such training due to micro-computing that can fulfill the mechanical demands of a task. ‘The smart machine can separate human mental learning. When this occurs, conceptual human powers suffer.’

The intellectual threat that is posed by the modern machines is illustrated through the use of CAD (computer-assisted design) in the profession of architects. The swift and precise CAD software has many benefits in architectural offices. The model can be lengthened, shrunk and rotated to view from different angles. It can even incorporate the effect of light, wind, or seasonal temperature. This facility rids the architect of refining their concepts and designs through hand, to get deeply involved in it and mature thinking about it. The site thus becomes ‘ingrained in the mind.’

The traditional way of drawing architectural plans involved rough sketching, then a detailed drawing, modeling, going to the site and then returning to drawing. ‘You think and you do at the same time.’ The craftsman’s approach, thus, marries thought with action.

‘This attaching, circular metamorphosis can be aborted by CAD’ as ‘the algorithms do the drawing.’ It encourages a closed system and is ‘a static means’ which ends the ‘circularity’ of the process. As the software allows instant erasure and refiguring, ‘the architect Elliot Felix observes, “each action is less consequent than it would be on paper … each will be less carefully considered.” Incorporating the texture and material of buildings in hand drawing prompts the designer to ponder about the materials used and ‘to engage with their solidity’ against the plane of paper. CAD also prevents the designer from judging the scale realistically as the object onscreen appears as ‘the relation of clusters of pixels.’

‘What appears on-screen is impossibly coherent, framed in a unified way that physical sight never is.’

The author is also not in favor of blueprints as erasure was quite messy which left no room for reconsideration of initial plans throughout the process. It widened the gap between use of head and hand in design as the idea of the building was complete in ‘conception before it was constructed.’

The shortcomings of CAD software is explained through the design of Georgia’s Peachtree Center. Though the design is pedestrian-friendly, the outdoor seating of the cafés does not take account of the intense Georgia heat and they are mostly empty from late morning to late afternoon. The plan was made in an ideal setting, reinforced by the computer simulation. Another example would be that rooms of the hotel made by John Portman look outward over parking lots. ‘CAD is often used to hide them (problems). The difference accounts for some of CAD’s commercial popularity; it can be used to repress difficulty.’

Modern computer programs learn the mechanical tasks through data feedback but the people using the software miss out on learning and become a passive witness to the growth process. ‘When the head and the hand separate, it is the head that suffers.’

In the parking garages, the lower edge of each bumper at the end of the car stalls was sharp and had been smoothened manually by steel grinders, as evident from its irregularity. ‘The craftsman had thought for the architect.’ Painters, of the white strip lines to guide drivers, were improvised to guide in and out of irregularity pools of light. The manual workers could think about the designs more realistically and thus improvise. They were ‘bearers of embodied knowledge’, gained through action and experience, rather than mere thought.

‘The hand and the head are not simply separated intellectually but socially.’

In the ‘Conflicting Standards’ section, the author contrasts correctness of a craft with its functionality. It is possible for one to do good enough work but it would be in conflict with the principles of craftsmanship . ‘To the absolutist in every craftsman, each imperfection is a failure; to the practitioner, obsession with perfection seems a prescription for failure.’

According to Isaac Stern, the more people practice, the more impossible their standards become. The author illustrates the difference between practice and practical through the Britain’s National Health Service’s (NHS) numerical measures for determining how well doctors and nurses do their jobs. But the numerical measures diminished the quality of care. The reform of the quality of work of NHS brought forth the studies of nurses that remarked what it meant to be a craftsman, ‘To do good work means to be curious about, to investigate, and to learn from ambiguity.’ In other words, a constant cycle of improvement through problem solving and problem finding. The numerical standards imposed on the doctors and nurses did not account for the experimentation that is involved with improving the quality of work. Many reforms have been ruled for the NHS but actual practice and forming a routine of the reforms takes time. This is necessary as it forms an anchor to judge other suppositions of good quality work.

As the conclusion, the author defines what it means to be a craftsman. It means to deploy relational thinking about objects and to be patient throughout the process of producing quality work. ‘It emphasizes the lessons of experience through a dialogue between tacit knowledge and explicit critique.’

Popular

My TKS Application journey

My journey  I applied for The Knowledge Society in February 2022. Initially, I had opened an application but then decided not to go for it, thinking that I wasn't smart enough to get in. Mia Nguyễn was my application advisor who mailed me about my incomplete application, asking me if there was anything I needed help with. There were few interview slots remaining and she asked if they should close my application. I opened her mail and began typing an apology letter, telling her that I would not be applying. As I finished the letter, my finger hovered over the send button. I sighed, selected my mail and pressed backspace. What was the harm in trying? I typed out a quick message, asking her to hold my slot. I opened MS Word and started on the essays I needed and stayed up all night, only to submit them a few hours before the deadline.  In late April, I was accepted into the 10 month Global Virtual Program as a TKS Innovator with considerable financial aid. Unfortunately, my finan...

The summer of the beautiful white horse: Analysis, Summary and Theme

The summer of the beautiful white horse. : An Analysis  This short story written by William Saroyan is part of the CBSE Class 11 Snapshots NCERT Syllabus. While high school students would certainly benefit from the articles, literary enthusiasts are encouraged to join the discussion of how the author uses diction, literary terms and tone to portray the meaning of through the text.   Nostalgia marks the tone of narrator in the opening line of the sentence, reminiscing over how the world used to be magnificent and delightful. The sentence “life was still a delightful and mysterious dream” aptly describes how the narrator perceived the world as a nine year old. The theme of exaggeration and awe is repeatedly seen throughout the story through the character of uncle Khosrove and the narrator’s admiration of the horse. So awe stricken was Aram that he could not believe his eyes when his “crazy” cousin Mourad brought a beautiful white horse outside the window of his room around daybr...

Mistakes I have made as a high-school student

I was introduced to the U.S. College admissions in my Grade 10 when I saw an Instagram advert of Stanford. The pandemic was still raging and that was my excuse for not being able to work on my extracurriculars which were practically none. I postponed the activities to next year, the year 2021. I look back and think how naive I was. I was waiting for schools to open and blissfully waiting. The next year came and the situation still seemed bleak. It was then I realized that I cannot wait for things to go offline. My final exams of a grade that was spent online got cancelled and I was free by mid April. I was so fickle minded when it came to which college degree I wanted to have. All I knew was I wanted to study abroad. My junior year school admissions were postponed too. For a while I was happy about being cut off from the tethers of board exams. But satisfaction does not stay for long in my mind. When May came I was frantic about my extracurriculars. I was so desperate fo...